Last modified: 2019-10-08
Abstract
This research purposed to describe quality of learning support material prototype on Energy topic for Junior High School. The quality that focused in this research were (1) validity and (2) practicality aspects. Guided inductive inquiry (GII) is a learning model to facilitate students to have a comprehensive understanding of concepts, develop complex thinking skills, and help internalize understanding of concepts within students that they can use to solve problems, develop competencies, and improve learning outcomes.
Â
This research used Mafumiko’s Model to develop prototype of learning support materials based on design research. This study conducted at SMPN 1 Tanah Grogot, Paser Regency, East Kalimantan and involved 3 (three) subject matter experts (SMEs) and 2 (two) observers during classroom tryout.
Â
The result of validity criterium according to the SMEs for the GII learning support materials showed in the Table 1 and Table 2.
Â
Table 1. Lesson plans validity
Â
Lesson Plans
Validity Coefficient
Reliability
Explanation
I
0.97
0.81
Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable
II
0.95
0.95
Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable
III
0.95
0.87
Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable
Average
0.96
0.88
Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable
Table 2. Students worksheet validity
Â
Student Worksheet
Validity Coefficient
Reliability
Explanation
I
0.91
0.84
Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable
II
0.95
0.84
Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable
III
0.96
0.81
Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable
Average
0.94
0.83
Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable
Â
The result of practicality criterium based on actual practicality (lesson plans implementation) and students’ activities showed in the Table 3 and Table 4.
Â
Table 3. Recapitulation of the lesson plans implementation
Â
Learning
Percentage of Implementation
Explanation
Lesson plan I
97.22
Very Good Criteria
Lesson plan II
98.15
Very Good Criteria
Lesson plan III
100.00
Very Good Criteria
Average
98.46
Very Good Criteria
Â
Table 4. Recapitulation of the students’ activities
Â
Students’ Activities
Percentage of Implementation on Meeting
Explanation
I
II
III
Pay attention to the teacher's explanation and asking
32.36
31.96
32.49
Very Good Criteria
Work in team
15.35
15.64
15.51
Very Good Criteria
Inquiry activities
36.52
36.05
35.45
Very Good Criteria
Communication
15.77
16.35
16.55
Very Good Criteria
Irrelevant behavior
0
0
0
Not Observed
Total
100
100
100
-
Reliability (observers’ agreement)
95%
98%
98%
Reliable
Â
Based on these results despite some limitations, could be concluded that the quality of GII learning materials prototype on Energy topic at Junior High School met the validity and practicality criteria.