Open Conference Systems, MISEIC 2019

Font Size: 
Development of Guided Inductive Inquiry Learning Support Materials Prototype on Energy for Junior High School Level: Validity and Practicality Study
Muhamad Arif Mahdiannur

Last modified: 2019-10-08

Abstract


This research purposed to describe quality of learning support material prototype on Energy topic for Junior High School. The quality that focused in this research were (1) validity and (2) practicality aspects. Guided inductive inquiry (GII) is a learning model to facilitate students to have a comprehensive understanding of concepts, develop complex thinking skills, and help internalize understanding of concepts within students that they can use to solve problems, develop competencies, and improve learning outcomes.

 

This research used Mafumiko’s Model to develop prototype of learning support materials based on design research. This study conducted at SMPN 1 Tanah Grogot, Paser Regency, East Kalimantan and involved 3 (three) subject matter experts (SMEs) and 2 (two) observers during classroom tryout.

 

The result of validity criterium according to the SMEs for the GII learning support materials showed in the Table 1 and Table 2.

 

Table 1. Lesson plans validity

 

Lesson Plans

Validity Coefficient

Reliability

Explanation

I

0.97

0.81

Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable

II

0.95

0.95

Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable

III

0.95

0.87

Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable

Average

0.96

0.88

Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable

Table 2. Students worksheet validity

 

Student Worksheet

Validity Coefficient

Reliability

Explanation

I

0.91

0.84

Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable

II

0.95

0.84

Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable

III

0.96

0.81

Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable

Average

0.94

0.83

Valid and the examination from the SMEs reliable

 

The result of practicality criterium based on actual practicality (lesson plans implementation) and students’ activities showed in the Table 3 and Table 4.

 

Table 3. Recapitulation of the lesson plans implementation

 

Learning

Percentage of Implementation

Explanation

Lesson plan I

97.22

Very Good Criteria

Lesson plan II

98.15

Very Good Criteria

Lesson plan III

100.00

Very Good Criteria

Average

98.46

Very Good Criteria

 

Table 4. Recapitulation of the students’ activities

 

Students’ Activities

Percentage of Implementation on Meeting

Explanation

I

II

III

Pay attention to the teacher's explanation and asking

32.36

31.96

32.49

Very Good Criteria

Work in team

15.35

15.64

15.51

Very Good Criteria

Inquiry activities

36.52

36.05

35.45

Very Good Criteria

Communication

15.77

16.35

16.55

Very Good Criteria

Irrelevant behavior

0

0

0

Not Observed

Total

100

100

100

-

Reliability (observers’ agreement)

95%

98%

98%

Reliable

 

Based on these results despite some limitations, could be concluded that the quality of GII learning materials prototype on Energy topic at Junior High School met the validity and practicality criteria.

Keywords


Guided Inductive Inquiry; Junior High School; learning support materials; practicality; validity