Post-mining land-use planning is an inseparable part of the mining industry cycle chain. Generally, the planning is carried out since the beginning of the mine to be established. Community involvement in that planning becomes something that cannot be avoided because they will be the object later. But usually alternative post-mining land uses are more focused on the benefit aspect only. This research is here to add a community resilience framework as material for local people's preference for their choice of post-mining land-use planning. The aim is to find out the community resilience around the mine area, their preference for alternative land-use planning, and to determine the effect of heterogeneity on their choices, as well as predicting the welfare value of the surrounding community based on the prepared scenarios. We use qualitative and quantitative approaches in this study. We used a qualitative method by interviewing to assess community resilience. Then quantitative method we use the choice of experiment to provide various alternative choices to the local community for post-mining land-use planning. We are predicted that the Community have good community capitals and resilience; the community prefer to land-use planning that good impact well-being; and land-use planning will be a good impact to community around of mining industry